📐 Reintegration into China would cost Taiwan its empowerment rights

Violent protests in Hong Kong show how Chinese Communist Party dominance is eroding citizens' empowerment. In Taiwan, the situation could end up far worse. Stephen Bagwell and Meridith LaVelle explore potential outcomes of Chinese intervention, using evidence from Hong Kong and data from the Human Rights Measurement Initiative

What’s going on?

Over the past year, relations between Taiwan and China have deteriorated to a level not seen in decades. Recent Chinese Communist Party (CCP) rhetoric led to US politicians including Nancy Pelosi making official state visits to Taiwan. Given the deteriorating relations between China and Hong Kong, we should be worried. Evidence from recent CCP interventions in Hong Kong point to a grim future for a reintegrated Taiwan.

Taiwan's reintegration into China has been a long-stated CCP foreign policy goal. Xi Jinping is particularly vocal about it. If the CCP succeeds in regaining control of Taiwan, respect for human rights, especially empowerment rights, is likely to decline severely.

Evidence from Hong Kong suggests that if the CCP regains control of Taiwan, respect for human rights is likely to decline severely

The Human Rights Measurement Initiative (HRMI) measures rights across many years and in many countries, including China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Its category 'empowerment rights' covers rights to participate in government, to assembly and association, and to opinion and expression. Using the HRMI measures, we have studied how empowerment rights have changed over time. By analysing these three countries' respective human rights data, we enter this blog's conversation about human rights measurements to shed light on a situation of serious diplomatic concern.

What’s the situation in Taiwan?

Taiwan is currently a functional democracy with above average respect for empowerment rights. In contrast, since coming under CCP jurisdiction, respect for empowerment rights in Hong Kong has been drastically eroded. A similar situation could likely come to pass in Taiwan.

HRMI collects data on how governments respect civil and political rights in more than 40 countries around the world. Taiwan saw a slight decline in respect for empowerment rights during the pandemic. However, it still scores significantly better than most other countries in our sample.

In 2021, for example, Taiwan scores 7.2 out of 10 on the right to assembly and association. It scores 6.8 on expression, and 7.7 on the right to participate in government. The country's overall respect for empowerment rights score is 7.1. Where empowerment rights are lacking, it is usually the result of government intentionally restricting certain groups’ rights.

How well is Taiwan's government respecting each empowerment right? (2021)

Empowerment rights Taiwan 2021
Source: humanrightsmeasurement.org

HRMI’s qualitative data on empowerment rights sheds more light on whose rights are restricted. Groups particularly affected include those who engage in nonviolent protests against the government, human rights advocates, and people with particular political beliefs or affiliations.

Specifically, these groups include ‘trade unions, military and police personnel, educators, migrant workers, and civil servants’ and in general anyone who criticises the government. This latter category, as indicated by the experts who participated in the HRMI Expert Survey, became more apparent during Covid-19. The Taiwanese government began to clamp down on media critical of government (in)actions during lockdown. Compared to what has happened in Hong Kong, however, the decline in respect for these rights in Taiwan seems minimal.

What have we seen elsewhere?

Over the past several years, China has been increasingly active in restricting human rights – especially empowerment rights – in Hong Kong. Despite assurances of ‘One Country, Two Systems’, Xi Jinping has prioritised crackdowns on political freedom in Hong Kong. In 2020, at the CCP's behest, Hong Kong passed a National Security Law severely limiting the right to protest.

Hundreds of protestors and pro-democracy activists have already been arrested and imprisoned under the authority of this law. Recent work on human rights conditions in Hong Kong shows that in the two years since the law’s passage, empowerment rights in particular have experienced a major decline.

There are key differences, however, between Taiwan and Hong Kong. Taiwan enjoys a growing and distinct national identity, and has a longer history of freedom from either British or Chinese Communist rule. A generational divide exists between citizens' viewpoints on their duty to fight or surrender. Even if Taiwan achieved peaceful reintegration, dissatisfied citizens would probably form an organised resistance. And a resistance can accelerate to an insurgency.

Xi Jinping's regime might view indiscriminate repression as the most cost-effective strategy for dealing with Taiwanese dissent

Quashing such a resistance would test Chinese security forces, who are largely untried in such an operation. China’s military-security apparatus has multiple pots on the boil, including ongoing humanitarian crimes against Uyghurs in Xinjian, and the reincorporation of Hong Kong. It would therefore be tasked with maintaining order on multiple fronts.

This, combined with increased economic constraints, will influence Chinese decision-making. Xi Jinping's regime and the CCP might view indiscriminate repression as the most cost-effective strategy for dealing with Taiwanese dissent. In some ways, then, Hong Kong's experience of increased CCP influence and repression would mark a best-case scenario for a reintegrated Taiwan.

What else could happen?

There is ample evidence – including Russia’s invasion of Ukraine – of how human rights conditions deteriorate during times of war. But the possibility also exists that Taiwan might ‘peacefully’ reintegrate with China.

The only obvious path to maintain respect for empowerment rights in Taiwan is for the island to maintain its independence

However, given the rights trajectory in Hong Kong, it seems unlikely that the CCP would take seriously any agreement guaranteeing freedoms and empowerment rights for the Taiwanese. The only obvious path to maintain respect for empowerment rights in Taiwan is for the island to maintain its independence. In so doing, however, Taiwanese leaders should take care not to infringe the empowerment rights of their own people.

The generation that supports Taiwanese independence views democratic values as a key differentiator between China and Taiwan. Any steps by Taiwan's government to crack down on rights of assembly, association, and participation could cause a shift in public opinion and a muddying of the line between the two regimes.

📐 No.7 in our Measuring Human Rights series, discussing the challenges and limits of methodologies for gathering human rights data

This article presents the views of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the ECPR or the Editors of The Loop.

Contributing Authors

photograph of Stephen Bagwell Stephen Bagwell Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of Missouri-St. Louis More by this author
photograph of Meridith LaVelle Meridith LaVelle PhD Candidate, University of Georgia More by this author

Share Article

Republish Article

We believe in the free flow of information Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Creative Commons License

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

The Loop

Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
Read more
THE EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH
Advancing Political Science
© 2020 European Consortium for Political Research. The ECPR is a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO) number 1167403 ECPR, Harbour House, 6-8 Hythe Quay, Colchester, CO2 8JF, United Kingdom.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram