Bhimrao Ambedkar as theorist of democracy

Bhimrao Ambedkar was many things, and is often known as a political activist and an anti-caste thinker. In addition, Scott R. Stroud positions Ambedkar as a theorist of democracy who extends the pragmatist tradition

The paradox of democracy

Democracy, as this series makes clear, seems to impose on its practitioners an impossible demand. They must push vigorously for their vision of the world and their community, at times against other community members who think differently. But at the same time, they must remain open to other members of the political community. Democracy demands that we assert ourselves in improving our communities while remaining open to disagreement about how that community ought to be improved.

This paradox clearly applies to elected leaders making policies. However, limiting the challenges of democracy to formal decision-making procedures and officials is an artificial truncation of what is at stake in our communities.

To pluralists, democracy goes deeper than periodic votes or organised decision-making instead, it is a way of life

The pluralistic tradition known as pragmatism is associated most prominently in American thinkers such as Charles Peirce, William James, John Dewey, and Jane Addams. They all sensed that democracy went deeper than periodic votes or organised decision-making. Its currents ran below dry books and abstract theories about political ideals. It centred on how we saw the other individuals we lived with and, perhaps, could form a sort of close community in our everyday lives. Pragmatism saw democracy as a habit or way of life.

American pragmatism in India?

If theres a story of pragmatism in India, it must centre on Bhimrao Ambedkar (18911956).

Ambedkar took courses from Dewey and others while studying at Columbia University in 19131916. As an untouchable, Ambedkar felt the sting of millennia of caste traditions and customs. For many around him, his physical presence and touch was religiously impure.

Even after he earned five different graduate degrees from institutions in America and Britain, he could not find housing because of his caste status. Caste ostracisation affected him in both social and economic spheres. In the light of these experiences, he committed to resisting and reforming the structures that promote caste oppression in India.

Ambedkar held a lifelong interest in his teacher Deweys thought, collecting his books into the final years of his life. Dewey's themes proved valuable in the battle against caste oppression. As a result, we can also speak of Ambedkar as a pragmatist philosopher.

Ambedkar on the tense balance of social democracy

Thinking about Ambedkars work as a new variety of pragmatism attunes us to his status as a theorist of democracy. He is well known as an anti-caste philosopher because he diagnosed caste divisions in Indian society as opposed to the sort of democracy he, and Dewey, desired. In doing so, he creatively added to the pragmatist idea of democracy as a way of life among citizens who often disagree with each other. By focusing on Ambedkar as a theorist of democracy and its unique iterations, we discover a compelling voice for our times of division and polarisation.

Ambedkar, as a theorist of democracy, adds something powerfully new to Dewey's ideas. He is a compelling voice in our times of division and polarisation

Ambedkars account shares Deweys quest for communities animated by shared interests. What he adds is powerfully new. Whereas Dewey tentatively postulated growth as the ethical ideal moral activity, Ambedkar advanced the values of liberty, equality, and fraternity.

Liberty, equality, fraternity

These values serve as semi-transcendent ideals that reside between timeless and absolute standards like divine commands, and more immanent views like Deweys that tend to picture morality as emerging from ones group customs and history. The latter option would not work. The target of Ambedkars critique, after all, was the bulk of the Hindu tradition. This defined him as an untouchable through its sacred texts and law books. The former also would not suffice. A pragmatist, Ambedkar was sceptical of any claims to access a moral standard residing outside the realm of experience and inquiry.

Ambedkar used liberty, equality, and fraternity in his theories because they represent separate, and sometimes conflicting, aspects of democratic experience

Ambedkar did not find equality, liberty, and fraternity to be useful because they had some special origin. Instead, they were useful because they attach to separate, and sometimes conflicting, aspects of democratic experience. We each want to set our lifes course the way we desire, hence we value freedom or liberty. We react negatively to claims that some are naturally better or superior to others, especially if we are on the lower end of that claim of inequality. Hence, we value equality.

Oppression becomes visible when equality is rejected or liberty negated for those we believe should matter. Therefore, fraternity, or fellow-feeling, is also vital for pragmatists like Ambedkar. It points to what we want to accomplish in acting on our theories of democracy. We seek communities animated by shared interests, and attitudes among members that see others as community members, not merely as obstacles or enemies to overcome.

Ambedkar and the future of democracy

Approaching Ambedkar as a theorist of democracy offers an interesting and novel pragmatist account of democracy as a way of life. It posits a complex notion of justice, one that recognises the lack of freedom and the presence of inequality, but that puts these problems in a productive tension with the demands of fraternity or fellow-feeling. Justice becomes the creation of a state that balances a maximum of social equality, liberty, and fraternity.

We cannot sacrifice one value for others in our political activity. How can we address inequality while preserving as much freedom as possible? How can an activist or political leader free those who are oppressed while still maintaining the conditions for fraternity with allies and those who might be seen as enemies?

Democracy means forming community among those who agree and those who disagree. Ambedkar recognised this, and thus is a vital thinker to our discussions of democracy in a time of deep divisions.

No.97 in a Loop thread on the science of democracy. Look out for the  to read more in our series

This article presents the views of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the ECPR or the Editors of The Loop.

Author

photograph of Scott R. Stroud
Scott R. Stroud
Associate Professor of Communication Studies, University of Texas at Austin / Program Director of Media Ethics, Center for Media Engagement

Scotts research engages a range of topics in ethics, rhetoric, and philosophy.

His work is particularly interested in the pragmatist tradition and its global extensions.

He tweets @scottrstroud

The Evolution of Pragmatism in India: Ambedkar, Dewey, and the Rhetoric of Reconstruction by Scott R. Stroud

The Evolution of Pragmatism in India: Ambedkar, Dewey, and the Rhetoric of Reconstruction
Chicago, 2023

The Evolution of Pragmatism in India by Scott R. Stroud

The Evolution of Pragmatism in India: An Intellectual Biography of B.R. Ambedkar
HarperCollins India, 2023

Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric by Scott R. Stroud

Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric
Penn State University Press, 2014

John Dewey and the Artful Life Pragmatism, Aesthetics, and Morality Scott R. Stroud

John Dewey and the Artful Life: Pragmatism, Aesthetics, and Morality
Penn State University Press, 2011

Read more articles by this author

Share Article

Republish Article

We believe in the free flow of information Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Creative Commons License

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Loop

Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
Read more
THE EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH
Advancing Political Science
穢 2023 European Consortium for Political Research. The ECPR is a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO) number 1167403 ECPR, Harbour House, 6-8 Hythe Quay, Colchester, CO2 8JF, United Kingdom.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram