Authoritarian U-turns in some countries, but not others

Over the past two years, the number of people living under populist governments has dropped by 800 million. Why? Gülşen Doğan explains the factors helping to overturn authoritarian rule, and reveals why authoritarian leaders have been unseated in some countries, but not in others

The challenge of right-wing populism

Democracies face ongoing challenges from alternative governance models, such as hybrid regimes and closed autocracies. In recent years, right-wing populism has emerged as a global phenomenon. Elected governments, meanwhile, increasingly appropriate the institutions of liberal democracy: the legal system, electoral processes, civil society, democratic discourse, and social media platforms.

Some populist movements may not have achieved significant electoral victories. But they have nonetheless played a crucial role in shaping political discourse in their respective countries. Prominent examples include Alternative für Deutschland, and Marine Le Pen's Rassemblement National. Populist movements in Bulgaria, Poland, Brazil, the Czech Republic, the United States and Italy all experienced setbacks in their most recent elections. The result is a global decline in the number of populist leaders in office. This downturn is the result of a number of factors, including poor management of the coronavirus pandemic, and the rise of anti-populist opposition coalitions.

Populist movements in Bulgaria, Poland, Brazil, the Czech Republic, the US and Italy all experienced setbacks in their most recent elections

Authoritarian reversal has been the subject of lively debate, particularly in light of social democrats' victories in Germany and Portugal, and wins for left-wing parties in Chile, Brazil, and Colombia. In these countries, there is little political violence, and losing candidates are generally willing to accept defeat. Democratic institutions in these countries have thus become the real winners of these recent elections.

Democratisation is reversible, as is authoritarianism. But why does authoritarian reversal happen in some countries and not in others?

Consolidation of authoritarian populism

Authoritarian populists strive to destroy the system of checks and balances. They disregard political pluralism. Such executive aggrandisement can have varying impacts on the chances of authoritarian breakdown.

For example, authoritarian leaders can manipulate the electoral process and suppress political opposition – by lawful or unlawful means. Changes in established political rules weaken democratic institutions and erode their resilience against the consolidation of political authority. When this happens, the deterioration of democratic institutions and the suppression of civil society increase the likelihood of authoritarians remaining in power.

Conversely, electoral success for the opposition means their discourse must move beyond simply denouncing the government as fascist and dictatorial. Opposition parties must develop unique, effective policies that differ from their authoritarian predecessors'. In the political arena, they must use less polarised language and encourage discussion about citizens' pressing day-to-day needs and problems.

To unseat autocratic incumbents, opposition parties must develop unique, effective policies that differ from their authoritarian predecessors'

Consolidation of autocracy is a process in a regime's transition into an established form of authoritarian populism. It is successful when the likelihood of regime change remains consistently unfavourable in the short and medium term.

From a methodological point of view, we can identify authoritarian populism by analysing the ongoing transformation of democratic processes and relations, rather than confining attention to a particular episode or moment.

Sustainability of authoritarianism in the post-authoritarian era

Although authoritarian regimes can revert to democratic leadership, the threat of authoritarianism remains ever-present. After the shift to a democratic system, individuals who occupied positions of power during the period of authoritarian rule frequently maintain their political power. This may be because constitutions established during the authoritarian era are still binding. Or it may be the continued existence within the system of authoritarian-era bureaucratic officials and right-wing political parties.

After the shift to a democratic system, individuals who occupied positions of power during the period of authoritarian rule frequently maintain their political power

In such cases, opposition forces’ strategies are crucial in mitigating polarisation. These strategies must address the demands of the electorate, and prevent the resurgence of authoritarian populism.

For example, Jair Bolsonaro lost the most recent elections in Brazil. Yet his appointees and supporters persist in eroding Brazilian democracy. The United States remains similarly susceptible to a resurgence of right-wing populism, given the persistently high levels of polarisation and the enduring popularity of Donald Trump. Bolsonaro and Trump have cultivated passionate followings through social media, circumventing the need for conventional political party infrastructure. When defeated, they allege fraudulent activity, their appeals rooted predominantly in the notion that they alone represent 'the people'. This approach fortifies existing polarisation in their respective nations. It impedes the transition from authoritarian populist governance to a democratic system, keeping democracy in a precarious state.

Global and domestic challenges

The recent decline in the number of populist leaders is a significant pattern. Opposition parties have managed to oust populists from office. However, representative democracy still faces a crisis of confidence and governance. Political, economic, and physical insecurity fuels support for leaders who pledge to restore stability, order, and national pride, often through authoritarian methods.

Governments today face unemployment, inequality, racism, violence, mass migration, and the effects of the climate crisis. Online misinformation competes with legitimate news sources, and demagogy is rife. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the new Israel-Gaza war have reignited the early-2000s debate on the competing demands of security and freedom.

2024 is a big election year around the world. Elections in the rapidly growing economies of Indonesia and India, in particular, carry huge significance. And elections for new leadership of the European Parliament will influence the future of democracy in Europe.

In light of all this, will right-wing populism continue its ascent? Or will another wave of re-democratisation emerge around the world? Given the persistence of the authoritarian populist threat, even in the post-authoritarian era, opposition actors play a key role in ensuring democratic survival. Executive aggrandisement makes authoritarian breakdown less likely. And whether it happens depends on the context and historical trajectories of individual nations.

This article presents the views of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the ECPR or the Editors of The Loop.


photograph of Gülşen Doğan
Gülşen Doğan
PhD Candidate in Political Science and International Relations, Koç University

Gülşen graduated summa cum laude from Bogazici University with a BA in Political Science and International Relations & Sociology.

She received her MA in International Relations from Koç University, with a thesis on the institutional and ideological conditions for the extent of executive aggrandisement in Turkey and Brazil over the last decade.

Her research interests lie at the intersection of populism, democratic backsliding, political economy, governance, political parties, migration diplomacy, disaster diplomacy, and gender and politics.

She studies Turkey, Brazil and the EU.

During her undergraduate studies, Gülşen chaired the Center for European Studies Student Forum (CESSF), which organises academic meetings and publishes analyses and policy recommendations on the processes of EU politics and EU-Turkey relations.

In 2022, she also worked as a non-resident research assistant in the Turkey programme at the Middle East Institute (MEI).

Between 2020 and 2023, she worked as a researcher and editor in Democratization and Development Programmes at an Istanbul-based think tank, Istanbul Political Research Institute (IstanPol).

She currently works at MiReKoç (Migration Research Center at Koç University) as a project researcher for the Horizon Europe Twinning project: BROAD-ER (Bridging the Migration and Urban Studies Nexus).


Read more articles by this author

Share Article

Republish Article

We believe in the free flow of information Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Creative Commons License


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Loop

Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
Read more
Advancing Political Science
© 2024 European Consortium for Political Research. The ECPR is a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO) number 1167403 ECPR, Harbour House, 6-8 Hythe Quay, Colchester, CO2 8JF, United Kingdom.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram