Qatar on the playing field of international politics

Qatar is basking in the global spotlight as host of the 2022 World Cup. Less prominently, it is the latest country to introduce an asylum law. Frowin Rausis argues that Qatar’s new-found status as a global host, of football and of asylum seekers, serves to showcase the country, and boost its global reputation

FIFA’s choice of Qatar to host the 2022 World Cup in October 2010 sent shockwaves across sport and politics. It was particularly surprising given that Doha’s bid was generally viewed as the weakest of all the candidate states. Football has become a wildly popular sport in many other Arab nations. Matches in the Qatar Stars League, however, typically attract only a few hundred spectators.

In 2018, Qatar adopted a national asylum framework. It was a move that attracted far less attention than its winning World Cup bid. Yet introducing an asylum law was equally surprising given Doha’s almost complete lack of prior interest in refugee protection. Nevertheless, international NGOs praised Doha’s apparent commitment to becoming a safe haven for people fleeing persecution.

In 2018, Qatar introduced a national asylum framework – a surprising move, given the country’s lack of prior interest in refugee protection

Hosting the world's biggest sporting tournament and hosting people seeking protection appear to be two fundamentally different things. However, we can view both as attempts to convince the world of Qatar’s attractiveness and to enhance its global standing. In treating asylum as a political football on the field of international politics, Qatar follows a well-worn path.

Qatar’s unlikely asylum law

Political scientists call the ability of one country to influence other states without military or economic superiority 'soft power'. States applying soft power aim to improve their international influence and standing by persuading other states of their political and cultural capacities. Argentina’s hosting of the 1978 World Cup under military dictatorship, and India’s worldwide promotion of Yoga, are two clear examples.

When Qatar became the first Gulf state to enact an asylum law in 2018, it did so amid a diplomatic crisis. One year earlier, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, and Egypt had cut diplomatic and economic relations with their Gulf neighbour. The Arab Quartet publicly accused Doha of supporting terrorism, and petitioned FIFA to revoke Qatar as 2022 World Cup hosts.

By announcing it would provide protection to people fleeing persecution, Doha burnished its humanitarian credentials before the international community

Against this backdrop, introducing an asylum law reflected Doha’s aspiration to improve its public perception and overcome international isolation. By announcing it would provide protection to people fleeing persecution, Doha burnished its humanitarian credentials before the international community. It also signalled to the world that Qatar is a safe, modern state in a sea of strife and conflict.

Welcoming refugees to signal virtue

The simultaneous deployment of asylum as an instrument of humanitarian protection and to signal national honour is hardly new. During the Cold War, Western governments often gave a warm welcome to people fleeing the Iron Curtain. Welcoming refugees was seen as a sign of the superiority of the democratic capitalist West over the totalitarian communist East.

In turn, countries east of the Iron Curtain celebrated the arrival of artists and scientists leaving the capitalist West. Communist states welcomed these arrivals as proof that Western states were failing and that their citizens were tiring of the capitalist rat race.

However, the end of the global superpower contest brought about by the fall of the Iron Curtain meant that welcoming people from the other side no longer signalled moral and ideological superiority. Indeed, asylum seekers were rapidly recast as an economic burden and a cultural threat. Consequently, the collapse of communism was one reason behind the rise of policies of deterrence and containment, and the increasing adoption of physical and procedural barriers to asylum.

Asylum as a political football

FIFA president Gianni Infantino has praised the 2022 World Cup as the 'best in history'. However, Qatar's host status has been highly controversial because the country stands accused of abusing basic human rights. Moreover, the event has gained notoriety for lacklustre energy in the stadiums and the apparent ambivalence of host-country spectators. For example, when Qatar went 2-0 down in the first half against Ecuador, many Qataris simply left the stadium.

Despite having adopted an asylum law, Qatar has failed to establish the necessary structure to process asylum applications

Qatar showed similar ambivalence towards people seeking asylum in the country. Despite having adopted an asylum law, the Gulf state has been reluctant to establish the necessary structure to process asylum applications. This became abundantly clear when human rights organisations learned Qatar had threatened to expel a Yemeni national without bothering to consider his asylum claim.

Internationally, Qatar has been more generous. This year it launched the initiative FIFA Qatar 2022 for All: Sharing the Joy of Refugees and Displaced Persons, giving people in refugee camps across Africa and Asia the opportunity to watch World Cup matches on big screens. But just as other countries treated their asylum laws as signals of virtue and used refugees as political footballs, it seems that Qatar's national asylum framework is only for show.

This article presents the views of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the ECPR or the Editors of The Loop.


photograph of Frowin Rausis
Frowin Rausis
PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science, University of Lucerne and research fellow nccr – on the move

In his PhD project, Frowin studies the global spread of asylum policies.

He has set up the Safe Country Policies Dataset (SACOP), which provides information on the adoption of national asylum frameworks and safe country policies in 195 countries, from 1951 until 2021.

He tweets @frowinrausis

Read more articles by this author

Share Article

Republish Article

We believe in the free flow of information Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Creative Commons License


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Loop

Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
Read more
Advancing Political Science
© 2024 European Consortium for Political Research. The ECPR is a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO) number 1167403 ECPR, Harbour House, 6-8 Hythe Quay, Colchester, CO2 8JF, United Kingdom.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram