🦋 Democracy preserves dignity, a means to an end, not an end itself

Paula Sabloff, in a direct response to Jean-Paul Gagnon’s democracy challenge, argues that to understand what democracy means, we need to know what it is for. By exploring this, we arrive at a meaning that is about means, not ends. And it is not as complicated as we might think

Democracy and dignity

Jean-Paul Gagnon argues that for centuries, democracy has held many meanings, but they have not been collected and studied as a whole. He proposes to do that through building, over time, 'a mountain of data so anyone can explore it in response to the question "What is democracy?"'.

In response, I would suggest that we cannot answer the question until we ask / learn what is democracy for? Protesters in the 2011 Arab Spring, in 2012 Russia, and today in the United States have the answer: dignity. My experience with children three years of age and older shows that even they want to be treated with dignity. But my real understanding of the relationship between dignity and democracy comes from anthropological research among Mongolian citizens around the turn of this century, when their country had broken free of almost 70 years of Communist Party — totalitarian — rule. Mongolian researchers and I interviewed over 1,200 Mongolians to learn how they view democracy. Their answers have led me to believe that democracy is a means towards an end, not an end itself. This applies not only to Mongolians but to citizens of most nations today.

Totalitarian government treats adults like children, making all their life decisions for them

Democracy, I learned, enables people to make their own life decisions, including policy decisions. Totalitarian government treats adults like children, making all their life decisions for them and blocking them from having a voice in government.

How do we define democracy, then? By answering two questions: How does a democratic government protect people’s dignity? And, how do citizens assure their own dignity?

Democratic government’s responsibilities toward its citizens

First and foremost, a democratic government protects people’s human rights as laid out in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Among these are the right to life, to freedom from degrading punishment or enslavement, and to follow one’s own beliefs. They also include the right to citizenship and, most relevant to dignity, the right to self-determination.

But while the UDHR lays out basic rights, it is up to the government of sovereign nations to extend these rights to their inhabitants. Democratic government achieves this when it guarantees that all people are treated equally. Equality, in turn, is achieved through rule of law. Everyone is subject to the same laws, with no exceptions — and through justice — everyone receives fair treatment by the police and in the courts.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights lays out basic rights. But it is up to the government of sovereign nations to extend these rights to their inhabitants

Citizens' rights and freedoms

Democratic government protects the rights and freedoms of citizens. Political freedoms include free speech and a free press, the right to vote and participate in governance as elected officials, freedom of beliefs, as well as the right to protect one’s rights. Economic freedoms include the right to private property, and to engage in business or trade. They also include the right to choose one’s employment, to move freely within the nation, and to choose one’s education, which is preparation for employment.

A democracy preserves people’s dignity, their rights and freedoms, by supporting law and order. An orderly system in which inhabitants know the rules enables them to maintain their self-determination. Finally, a democracy provides a social safety net. Sometimes this is in the form of social security for the old; sometimes in the form of universal healthcare. These safety nets help maintain people’s independence, and therefore their self-worth.

Democratic government must be transparent and not corrupt. Only then can people participate in governance fairly

But democratic government does not stop with the guarantee of individual rights and freedoms. Rather, it safeguards citizens’ right to participate in governance through voting, serving as elected officials, contacting their representatives, demonstrating, etc. Most of all, democratic government guarantees that the people’s will is followed by practicing peaceful transfer of power following an election. In order to maintain these principles, democratic government is transparent and not corrupt. Only then can people participate in governance fairly.

Citizens’ duties toward maintaining democratic governance

Only by exercising their right to participate in governance can citizens maintain their dignity. A good part of dignity is self-determination on the national as well as the personal level. Citizens in a democracy participate in governance when they exercise their political rights and freedoms. They also participate in decision-making when they serve as elected officials at every level of government — from the school board to president or prime minister. Citizens in a democracy know that elected officials work for them.

How to characterise democracy in a few sentences? Democracy helps people achieve the universal goal of dignity. Democratic government accomplishes this by protecting human, political and economic rights as well as institutionalising the rule of law, justice and transparency. Citizens in a democracy fulfil their duty to maintain the system by actively participating in governance. It is the combination of government and citizen actions that make a democracy.

This article is the seventeenth in a Loop thread on the science of democracy. Look out for the 🦋 to read more in our series

This article presents the views of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the ECPR or the Editors of The Loop.

Author

photograph of Paula Sabloff
Paula Sabloff
External Faculty Fellow, Santa Fe Institute

A political anthropologist, Paula has researched people’s changing conception of democracy in Mongolia, patron-client relations regarding higher education institutions and their state legislatures in Pennsylvania and Mongolia, how the people of Cozumel Island (Mexico) kept the national government at bay for 116 years, and the political agency of women in premodern societies.

She is the author of Does Everyone Want Democracy? Insights from Mongolia (Routledge, 2013)

Does Everyone Want Democracy? Insights from Mongolia by Paula Sabloff

Paula has also contributed to professional and popular journals, and her research contributed to the museum exhibition Modern Mongolia: Reclaiming Genghis Khan.

Read more articles by this author

Share Article

Republish Article

We believe in the free flow of information Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Creative Commons License

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Loop

Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
Read more
THE EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH
Advancing Political Science
© 2020 European Consortium for Political Research. The ECPR is a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO) number 1167403 ECPR, Harbour House, 6-8 Hythe Quay, Colchester, CO2 8JF, United Kingdom.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram