Why Netanyahu has been forced to accept the US peace plan

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accepted Trump's plan for peace in Gaza in principle – though he is likely to try and sabotage it. Paul Whiteley warns that this is a dangerous strategy given Netanyahu's current dire approval ratings among ordinary Israelis

End of the road for Netanyahu?

In early October, Israel accepted the 20-point plan for peace in Gaza. It did so despite the fact that Benjamin Netanyahu has, in the recent past, sought to prolong the war with Hamas. But subverting the peace plan is unlikely to succeed because Netanyahu is now so very unpopular in Israel.

A 2024 public opinion survey showed that both Netanyahu and his coalition were very unpopular and, more recently, Israeli voters have increasingly lost confidence in his government. This means Netanyahu's coalition is likely to lose next year's election, and it may well collapse before then.

Netanyahu has done his best to avoid a ceasefire – even to the point of trying to kill the Palestinian delegation to peace talks in Qatar:

However, this policy appears to have run out of road. The United States has backed a comprehensive peace plan, which Netanyahu has had to accept. And there is another reason why Netanyahu has had to change tack: his unpopularity inside Israel itself.

Britain’s recognition of the Palestinian state follows that of France and Belgium. They now join the 80% of UN member states that have done this in the past. As a direct result of what the UN describes as the genocide in Gaza, the Israeli government has become even more isolated internationally.

As a direct result of what the UN describes as the genocide in Gaza, the Israeli government has become even more isolated internationally

A poll conducted in Israel for the Hebrew newspaper Maariv in August showed that 62% of respondents have lost confidence in Netanyahu's government, while only 27% retain confidence. Given this, it is interesting to examine the likely effects of these developments on Israel's next election, due on 27 October 2026.

Preferred party percentage in the Pew Survey of Israeli voters, May 2024

N=1001

The US polling company Pew Research conducts regular global attitude surveys. It releases the raw data from these surveys when they are no longer commercially valuable. This is something UK polling companies never do, despite the fact that it would promote transparency and make secondary analysis possible.

The most recent Pew survey, which is available in raw form, was completed in May 2024. It polled respondents in 35 countries, including Israel. The chart above shows support for the various political parties in the Israeli survey. Black columns are the parties in the government coalition; red columns the parties in opposition. The war had been going on for just over seven months when the survey was conducted. At that time, 38% of respondents supported the governing parties, and 58% the opposition parties.

As long as he clings to his Prime Ministership, Netanyahu remains immune from prosecution for alleged bribery and fraud

These figures help explain why Netanyahu wanted to keep the war going. If he could convince Israeli voters that he had achieved victory, this would boost support for his coalition. Moreover, as long as he clings to his Prime Ministership, Netanyahu remains immune from prosecution for alleged bribery and fraud. But his strategy has now failed for a number of reasons in addition to the US peace plan.

Problems with the strategy

The first problem with keeping the war going is that it meant abandoning Israeli hostages, three of whom were, in December 2023, mistakenly killed by Israeli defence forces. How can Israel protect its hostages when it uses indiscriminate bombing to support its claim that it is trying to get the hostages released?

The second problem is that at the time of the survey, Benjamin Netanyahu was already relatively unpopular in Israel. The chart below indicates whether respondents had a favourable or unfavourable view of the Prime Minister. While 42% did have a favourable view, 58% disapproved. More to the point, almost 40% had a very unfavourable view, revealing how deeply disliked Netanyahu is among a significant proportion of Israelis.

Israeli citizens' views of Benjamin Netanyahu, May 2024

A third problem is Israel’s loss of soft power; that is, its positive reputation and close ties with other nations. This loss has come about because of Israel's total reliance on hard power, or military force, in the current war. When even former allies such as Britain and France change their policies on the recognition of a Palestinian state, we are approaching a situation where the Unites States remains the only significant Israeli ally.

Israel's total reliance on military force has cost the country its 'soft power' advantages in international relations

However, US support in the future is far from guaranteed. An Economist/YouGov poll on 22 September showed that 28% of Americans sympathised most with Israel in the war, and 25% sympathised most with the Palestinians. The danger for Israel is that only 13% of Democrat identifiers in the survey sympathised with Israel, compared with 43% who sympathised with the Palestinians. If the Democrats start winning again, US policy towards Israel is likely to change, making the country even more isolated.

The coalition government in Israel is incredibly fragile, and could collapse at any time. At the moment it looks likely that if it survives to the next election, it will lose badly. After he is removed from power, Benjamin Netanyahu could then very well end up in jail.

This article presents the views of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the ECPR or the Editors of The Loop.

Author

photograph of Paul Whiteley
Paul Whiteley
Emeritus Professor, Department of Government, University of Essex

Paul's research interests lie in electoral behaviour, public opinion, political economy and political methodology.

He is the author or co-author of some 27 books on these topics and more than 100 academic articles.

He was appointed a Fellow of the Academy of Social Science in 2009 and a Fellow of the British Academy in 2012.

Paul is an active blogger and broadcaster, commenting mainly on contemporary British politics.

Read more articles by this author

Share Article

Republish Article

We believe in the free flow of information Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Creative Commons License

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Loop

Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
Read more
THE EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH
Advancing Political Science
© 2025 European Consortium for Political Research. The ECPR is a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO) number 1167403 ECPR, Harbour House, 6-8 Hythe Quay, Colchester, CO2 8JF, United Kingdom.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram