⛓️ What can political scientists do about the appalling events in Gaza and the West Bank?  

One of the reasons political scientists are silent on the Israel-Gaza conflict is the fear of being marginalised by the community, writes Catherine Moury. She suggests concrete actions scholars could take to avoid normalising what she – and many fellow academics – consider is nothing short of genocide

Despair and disappointment  

When I read about atrocity after atrocity happening in Palestine, I feel despair, anger, paralysis, and, within the political science community, loneliness. At conferences I attend, academics barely address the topic, or awkwardly avoid it. I read the X feeds of colleagues who post every day about current events, but not once about Palestine.

And, even though it offered to organise a ​​series of online seminars to discuss the topic (a very good thing), ​​​​ECPR's Executive Committee declined to issue a statement condemning Israel's actions in Gaza and in the West Bank, in response to an open ​​letter asking it to do so. Indeed, the reaction from a former Executive Committee member argued instead the case for ​​‘institutional neutrality’. It is worth noting that the ​​American Association of Anthropologists and ​​American Association of Sociologists have both made statements.  

At conferences I attend, academics barely address, or awkwardly avoid, the Israel-Gaza conflict

With notable ​​exceptions, I am disappointed by a community of scholars who are paid to study political matters, but seem unable to take a strong stance against a genocide. Today, and as I see it, it is simply dishonest to dispute the use of such a word, given the evidence in declarations by ​​Israeli ministers, the ​​rulings of the International Court of Justice and ​​International Criminal Court, in reports from IDF soldiers, ​​surgeons and ​​Israeli journalists, and in the ​​​​analysis of scholars of international law or genocide (including prominent Israeli scholars working on the Holocaust such as Amos ​​Goldberg and Omer Bartov).

So, I wonder: what can political scientists do about the genocide in Palestine?  

The continuation of action  

Earlier this year, Adam Standring and I posted on X an open ​​letter calling on ECPR to condemn the killings of civilians in Gaza. Nearly 500 political scientists signed the letter, and we received many messages from (precarious and tenured) researchers in response. Some explained that signing the letter might damage their already slim chances of getting a position or a grant if they publicly expressed a pro-Palestinian view, or even signed a letter supporting a ceasefire.

Vladimir Bortun received the ​​same letters after publishing his piece in the leftwing US magazine Jacobin, in which he addressed the financial links of many universities with sponsors as an explanation for their silence on Gaza. Those fears are anchored in reality. Academics have lost their jobs and even been arrested for their views on Palestine in countries including Germany and France. This is only the​​ tip of the iceberg.

It is not easy to take a stance, and precarious workers are rightly afraid for their career

In that context, it is not easy to take a stance. Precarious workers are rightly afraid for their career. Nobody, me included, likes to feel isolated in a group that constitutes us. The system has educated us to behave ‘professionally’. Now academia is telling us is that serious, respectful political scientists do not condemn the genocide in Gaza.  

What can I do now? What can we do now?

My ideas on concrete actions scholars can take: 

  1. Keep writing (open) letters, articles or blog posts, signing and posting, organising workshops, raising the issue at conferences. You might fear this risks becoming marginalised by the academic community. But the more people condemn, even with a post on X, the less other people will fear doing so. Social-media activism – a letter or signature – might sound frivolous in response to such tragedy. But it tells people where you stand, and this may give others courage to speak. People can make a difference when they act together.  
  1. Use your tenure, if you can. Only 13% of those who signed the ECPR letter are full professors, who risk less in speaking out. If tenure protects you, you have a special responsibility to act. Do not leave precarious workers on their own.  
  1. It's ok to change your mind as events unfold. If you supported Israeli actions initially, but now think Israel has crossed a line, say it. It is never too late.  
  1. If you want to launch a written initiative, do it with others. It feels less isolating, less risky, and your final text will be more inclusive and impactful.   
  1. Remember that the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement does not target individuals, but institutions. It does not advocate for ceasing to work with scholars in Israel, refusing to publish them or banning them from conferences. BDS, rather, is about stopping agreements with complicit Israeli institutions. Support for BDS shows that many in academia condemn Israel's actions.
  1. Protect your students when they protest, even if protests disrupt university affairs. Remember that the point of collective action is disruption. Sometimes the Dean or Rector is torn about what to do with student camps. Put your weight behind a peaceful, constructive resolution that does not involve the police.  

Normalising genocide is not an option 

It is tempting to be discouraged. Anyone who cares about civilians in Palestine feels so powerless right now. The number of political scientists – including several full professors – who did not hesitate to sign the open letter to ECPR reminds me that many colleagues do care. But inaction is not an option. Normalising genocide is not an option. A friend told me that he fears his children will ask him what he did during the genocide. Let’s all think about this when deciding on what to do right now.  

⛓️ No.11 in a Loop series examining constraints on academic freedom in a variety of global contexts

This article presents the views of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the ECPR or the Editors of The Loop.

Author

photograph of Catherine Moury
Catherine Moury
Associate Professor of Political Science, NOVA University of Lisbon

Catherine's research focuses on comparative politics and institutional change in the European Union.

She has published in the American Journal of Political Science, European Journal of Political Research, and Comparative Political Studies, among others.

Capitalising on constraint: Bailout politics in Eurozone countries

Her book Capitalising on Constraint: Bailout Politics in Eurozone Countries, co-authored with with Stella Ladi, Daniel Cardoso and Angie Gago, is published by Manchester University Press.

Read more articles by this author

Share Article

Republish Article

We believe in the free flow of information Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Creative Commons License

Comments

3 comments on “⛓️ What can political scientists do about the appalling events in Gaza and the West Bank?  ”

  1. It is sad but in no way surprising that this (just like any other pro-palestinian opinion piece I've read) does not even mention - let alone analyse - the rampant antisemitism. The author cannot even be bothered to mention the brutal attack with which Hamas started this war.
    What is surprising to me, is that the editors don't refrain from publishing an article that openly calls for supporting BDS by lying about their aims and tactics (of course BDS works relentlessly to exclude Israeli scholars from international networks and events) and that calls to protect protests on campus rather than protecting Jewish students, who have been violently attacked again and again all over Europe and the US.

  2. I believe that raping men and women, killing them in cold blood, starving and murdering hostages, aiming to destroy the state that the Jews got after 6 million of them were prosecuted is not an issue. Maybe because Jews are evil? Or maybe just because the world is simply divided between bad and evil?

    As a person who is critical of Israeli government, I cannot understand how someone can call himself a political scientist and have such a simplistic worldview.

    My grandmother and grandfather ran away from Nazi Germany less than 100 years ago; where should I live if you support the cause of those who want to rule from the river to the sea?

  3. What if true sad is that you still believe in your verduon of a
    Story that is fundamentally non questionably wrong ! If you want to publically share your thoughts, at least be respectful enough to do your research. ! I believe in everyone’s right to exist ! I just really despise when a person feels entitled publically take a righteous stand when they haven’t even earned or learned or asked questions ! I am sure your grandparents would be disappointed in your ignorance and hatred ! If they escaped nazis, I am so sorry for their pain ! But remember that Arabs Lebanese and Palestinians had nothing to do with that! You want to fight back and regain your power., go do it to the people who burned you and put you in camps ! Those sure were not the Lebanese or the Palestinian! Or are you so victimized that accepting weapons from your holocaust masters so you get to do to Arabs what was done to you and tell yourself you are the victim ! Remember your trauma and pain was done by Europeans ! The Arabs as you call us had nothing to do with your trauma !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Loop

Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
Read more
THE EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH
Advancing Political Science
© 2024 European Consortium for Political Research. The ECPR is a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO) number 1167403 ECPR, Harbour House, 6-8 Hythe Quay, Colchester, CO2 8JF, United Kingdom.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram