♟️ The rise of ‘information autocracies’: Kazakhstan and its constitutional referendum

To understand today’s autocratic regimes, we should look at how they exploit social media, argues Bakhytzhan Kurmanov. In Kazakhstan, a referendum in the name of ‘open government’ is effectively a sham. What's more, it is a cover for autocratic practices of silencing dissent

Hager Ali has argued that we urgently need a deeper understanding of evolving authoritarian regimes. This is especially the case in relation to the impact of the social media revolution on these regimes – and how regimes exploit that revolution for their own ends.

Post-Soviet Central Asian states have, generally, imitated the democratic reforms promoted by the West, especially those associated with open government. To the external observer, this might look like a good thing. But there is more to this development than meets the eye – as we see in Kazakhstan.

Kazakhstan referendum
Citizen activists in Nur-Sultan discuss the referendum. Screen reads: '5 June 2022. The all-people referendum.' Photo: Instagram

'Liberalisation' in Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan's first stage of reform in the tradition of promoting ‘open government’ began in 2019 with the election to the presidency of Kassym-Jomart Tokayev. His election had followed former President Nursultan Nazarbayev's sudden decision to step down.

Tokayev declared a wide-ranging liberalisation agenda based on creating a so-called 'Listening State', including a National Council of Public Trust. His apparent idea was to constrain state officials into 'listening' to citizens.

A second stage of liberalisation reforms began in the aftermath of riots in January 2022. The Kazakh government announced it would begin the transition towards a 'second republic' and the formation of 'New Kazakhstan'. The protests affected various regions of Kazakhstan and resulted in hundreds of deaths. The January riots exposed Kazakh citizens' intense dissatisfaction with the country's autocratic political system.

Responding to citizens’ demands for democratisation, Tokayev proposed 56 amendments to the constitution. These covered a wide range of issues, from reforming the constitutional court to changing the country's parliamentary system. They even called for removal the status of Kazakhstan's first president, Nursultan Nazarbayev.

Tokayev's reforms could prefigure the democratisation of Kazakhstan's hardline regime. But they are more likely to signal the emergence of an ‘information autocracy’

Tokayev called a national referendum on his professed vision of New Kazakhstan, for 5 June. But he failed open up his proposed changes to public discussion beforehand. Critics voiced serious concerns that citizens were unable vote on specific amendments. Rather, they must either accept all the proposed changes, or none at all.

Of course, it's possible Tokayev's proposed reforms could signal the democratisation of one of the region's hardline autocracies. But an alternative interpretation is that this is, in fact, an example of an emerging ‘information autocracy’. 

The rise of information autocracies

Almost twenty years ago, as the internet and social media revolution gained momentum, political scientists predicted such technologies would ultimately crush autocracies. However, autocratic regimes evidently understood the power of social media and the internet. In the intervening years, they have harnessed these forces to develop a new form of regime: information autocracies.

Two decades ago, political scientists predicted social media would help crush autocracies. But that was before authoritarian regimes learned to harness online power for their own ends

Sergei Guriev and Daniel Treisman have recorded the emergence of so-called 'information autocrats' who use technology to control the information space. Such autocrats create government messaging that distorts reality and makes its citizens believe in the legitimacy of authoritarian regimes. Autocratic rulers realised social media and digital technologies could coordinate their supporters, disseminate propaganda, influence online discourse, and identify genuine threats to their regimes.

As a result, these new information autocracies impose controls over the internet and seek to dominate social media. Countries from Russia to China are now engaging online activists and pro-government internet trolls.

Online oppression of citizen dissent

The Kazakh president uses Twitter to react to citizens' requests, but the consequences for political activists of using social media remain unchanged. In 2021, two activists were arrested in the Almaty region for criticising the government on social media and calling for citizen protests. A number of political activists were jailed or fined for protesting in Almaty during April 2022.

Kazakhstan's ranking in the Freedom on the Net index is low, and freedom of expression is obstructed. Moreover, in January, the Kazakh government temporarily shut down the internet in an attempt to clamp down on protesters.

Kazakhstan: the 'Listening' or ‘Persuasive’ state?

In classic autocratic tradition, no public campaign against the 5 June referendum proposals has materialised. More striking is the fact that Kazakh authorities were mobilising resources to persuade citizens to vote. As in information autocracies, the Kazakh regime is exploiting all digital technologies and resources to promote its narrative.

As in information autocracies, the Kazakh regime is exploiting all digital technologies and resources to promote its narrative

Secretary of State Yerlan Karin discussed the urgency of the referendum during a recent congress of Kazakhstani political scientists in Almaty. On Instagram, bloggers and activists mobilised to organise meetings with staff of numerous state and quasi-state organisations, from kindergartens to universities, to promote the proposed changes to the Kazakh constitution. Even TikTok users urged citizens to go to the polls and build a 'New Kazakhstan' rather than leave the country.

All of which is clear evidence of Kazakh authorities' realisation of the importance of controlling and influencing citizens on social media.

The constitutional referendum took place on 5 June without significant protests, and citizens went to the pools as expected. Preliminary results indicate that 68% of all eligible Kazakh citizens voted. Unsurprisingly, 77% expressed their support for the 'New Kazakhstan' vision at the referendum, while 18% voted against the changes to the Constitution.

Referendum Kazakhstan

A poster calls for citizens of Nur-Sultan city to find their polling stations and vote

Autocracies and the myth of reform

Optimists may interpret the 'Listening State' and the agenda of political reforms in Kazakhstan as the democratisation of a hybrid regime. Yet, a more accurate interpretation is one that views the reforms and constitutional referendum as stepping stones toward a form of information autocracy.

The massive digital campaign and the co-option of activists on social media in support of the referendum reveal how the Kazakh regime is being transformed into an information autocracy. It is one which seeks, above all, legitimisation and the construction of a good image, both at home and abroad.

♟️ No.4 in The Loop's Autocracies with Adjectives series examining the nuanced differences between autocratic regimes around the world

This article presents the views of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the ECPR or the Editors of The Loop.

Author

photograph of Bakhytzhan Kurmanov
Bakhytzhan Kurmanov
Assistant Professor, International School of Economics, M. Narikbayev KazGUU University, Nur-Sultan (Astana), Kazakhstan

Bakhytzhan's research interests include open government, citizen activism, authoritarian politics, public sector reforms, and the political economy of the post-soviet countries.

His work has been published in several leading journals, including Journal of Eurasian Studies, Europe-Asia Studies, and Eurasian Geography and Economics.

Bakhytzhan also writes analytical pieces for East Asia Forum at the Australian National University and for the Central Asia Program at George Washington University.

He completed his PhD in Public Policy at Nazarbayev University in 2021, investigating Open Government reform in Central Asia.

Bakhytzhan received his Master's degree in public administration from the Australian National University in Canberra and his BA in public policy and management from York University in Toronto.

He tweets @bakhyt_kurmanov

Read more articles by this author

Share Article

Republish Article

We believe in the free flow of information Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Creative Commons License

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

The Loop

Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
Read more
THE EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH
Advancing Political Science
© 2020 European Consortium for Political Research. The ECPR is a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO) number 1167403 ECPR, Harbour House, 6-8 Hythe Quay, Colchester, CO2 8JF, United Kingdom.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram