Far-right violence in the UK threatens democracy. Baris Cayli Messina argues for repressive state power to counter this threat. Recognising that democracy is fragile, he calls for action against organisations and people that fuel extremism. Cooperation between state institutions and non-state actors is essential to combat fascist violence and ensure peaceful coexistence

The fragility of democracy

The preservation of democracy is crucial to the wellbeing and prosperity of a nation. However, this ideal concept, founded on inclusivity and consensus, is fragile in the face of diverging ideologies and agendas. Over the past few days, far-right groups in Britain have organised violence and caused devastation in British cities.

Far-right violence poses a significant threat to democracy. Supporters of the far right manipulate democratic channels to push their own destructive objectives. By sowing conflict and mobilising more followers, they undermine the very core of democracy. To combat such threats, and preserve the integrity of democratic systems, the state must step in with repressive powers to protect fundamental democratic values.

Media and politicians justify far-right violence

Social movements use powerful propaganda to attract and manipulate the masses. For far-right extremists in the UK, propaganda channels their rage and aggression. Coupled with violence on the streets, such propaganda creates a dangerous brew that risks inciting public hysteria. Here, the media plays a crucial role. It can either fan the flames of violence, or inform the public about the origins and consequences of such violence. Unfortunately, traditional UK media outlets in the UK have fallen short.

By humanising the far right and downplaying their radical ideology, the media is inadvertently providing a platform for hateful beliefs to spread

Covering the recent violence, the BBC used the word 'protest' to describe the extremists' actions. These people were not 'protesting' anything, merely creating violent disorder. But by humanising such individuals and downplaying their radical ideology, the media is inadvertently providing a platform for their hateful beliefs to spread. The problem is made worse by traditional media outlets' lack of social control. On online platforms, weak regulation allows these groups to commit hate crimes, and to use them as propaganda.

As a result of all this, in recent days disturbing scenes of violence have broken out on UK streets. Citizens must now hold the media and online platforms accountable for their role in perpetuating dangerous far-right rhetoric.

Radicalisation through social 'echo chambers'

Online media, particularly X and Telegram, have become virtual gathering grounds in which extremist groups strategise and coordinate attacks with alarming efficiency. Through encrypted messaging apps and private forums, they share sensitive information such as the locations of refugee shelters, risking the safety of vulnerable populations.

Perhaps most concerningly, social media amplifies hate speech directed at minority communities. Online, fringe ideologies spread rapidly to a wide audience. Such platforms' algorithms often inadvertently promote controversial content, creating echo chambers that radicalise people yet further. This new digital landscape has transformed the dynamics of far-right mobilisation, presenting grave challenges for those working to counter extremism.

Dangerous political discourse

The dangerous rhetoric of some right-wing politicians targets minorities and immigrants. Spreading false information, these politicians reach millions through mainstream and social media. Such politicians' distorted, hate-filled narrative feeds the rage of those who seek to inflict violence on marginalised groups. Angry extremists channel this rage, blaming immigrants, refugees, or religious and ethnic minorities for problems unrelated to them.

One striking example is Nigel Farage inciting the recent Southport violence by fuelling conspiracy theories on social media which turned out to be totally unfounded and not true. To ensure equality and justice, it is essential we challenge such polarising discourse, and call out blatant falsehoods.

Repressive state power

Amid this alarming rise in far-right violence, we must examine the role of social media in amplifying extremist ideologies. Weakly regulated social media platforms provide a breeding ground for violent rhetoric and propaganda. This in turn fuels aggression on the streets, dividing communities yet further. There is a fine balance between upholding the right to free speech and keeping the peace – and it is one that needs urgent re-evaluation. The government must impose stricter rules on news reporting in traditional media. Distorted reporting risks validating the misguided motivations – and fuelling the anger – of radical and violent groups. In addition, essential priorities should include implementing stricter policies and legal measures, such as enhanced surveillance of right-wing and fascist groups both online and offline, stronger hate crime laws, tighter regulations on digital platforms, holding politicians accountable for incitement, and banning extremist groups.

Tighter control over social media is imperative to combat the spread of fascist ideals

Tighter control over social media and implementing strict law enforcement is imperative to combat the spread of fascist ideals and curb the far right's attempts to disrupt the peace. Therefore, to safeguard communities from destructive far-right violence, governments must urgently implement enhanced regulations and repressive strategies.

Towards a peaceful future

To prevent far-right violence – and indeed to block any radical group with fascist tendencies – state institutions and civil society organisations must work together to defend the rights of vulnerable people. The criminal justice system, law enforcement, media, lawmakers, schools, and members of the public should all be concerned about the dangers to democracy. All must join forces to strengthen the foundations of a harmonious society built on social justice. Our future prosperity depends upon the ability of us all to live together peacefully. It is essential that we do not abandon this fundamental principle.