‘Active Clubs’: a new collaborative phenomenon on the far-right scene

Increased cooperation between a subset of far-right street-gangs – Active Clubs – has largely passed under the radar. Jack Wippell argues this constitutes a ‘new’ threat, and draws from research on extremist organisations to explore what might follow. He highlights several limitations in what we know, and calls for immediate collaboration between researchers and practitioners

Setting the scene

The arrest of Robert Rundo earlier this month, founder of the now-defunct Rise Above Movement (RAM), sparked media interest in an emerging offshoot of the movement: far-right Active Clubs. These groups blend hyper-masculinity and white nationalism into an action-orientated approach to perceived social wrongs. The Active Club network has grown rapidly and now has a presence in at least 25 US states.

Another recent development, however, has slipped under the radar. In March, four Active Clubs in the Pacific Northwest announced the formation of a Northwest Nationalist Network (3N). These clubs are already among the largest; Rose City Nationalists (the Oregon chapter) has over 800 followers on Telegram.

With the formation of 3N, we will now begin to see widespread and coordinated efforts to combat the establishment’s anti-White agenda. In time, the PNW will no longer be synonymous with the BLM riots in Portland. Rather, the PNW will be seen as a bastion of hope for Our People. We will have our home again. 

NortHWest Nationalist network telegram channel, 25 february 2023

Why does this matter?

This move is concerning for several reasons. First, it signals that Active Club leaders are taking a more strategic approach to social change, one that increased access to material and human resources will foster. They want to make an impact.

Second, this bottom-up expansion contrasts with that of RAM's earlier strategy. Crackdowns on leaders are therefore unlikely to have as significant an effect. This is compounded by a political climate ripe for recruitment, with elections approaching and the misogyny-driven INCEL movement’s growth.

Active Clubs' bottom-up growth strategy means crackdowns on leaders are unlikely to make a significant impact

Most importantly, the move marks a fundamental shift in how far-right street gangs now operate. In contrast with the rivalries (and even outright conflicts) between historic skinhead gangs, Active Clubs now prioritise collaboration towards a shared goal. This presents new challenges.

What can we expect?

Existing work on the implications of changing dynamics in violent extremist organisations can provide insight into how Active Club activities may now change.

To date, Active Clubs have pursued non-violent action and rhetoric. However, the existing literature is still a useful guide, for several reasons. First, Active Clubs emerged directly from violent extremist organisations. Second, extremists often use non-violent rhetoric to ‘cover their tracks’. Concerns that action-focused rhetoric will cause, or inspire, violence are justified.

Active Clubs: potential strategies

To begin, increases in extremist group size and experience have been linked with higher frequencies of violence, and this in turn with a feedback loop that raises recruitment. This research analysed only violent attacks. However, with the growth this collaboration brings to each group through pooled resources, increased activity and recruitment may follow.

On top of this, strategic goals and resource constraints have long been linked with tactical choices. For instance, groups with more expansive goals tend to use firearms more than groups with narrow goals. The higher-level goals this collaboration signals, combined with the increased resources it presents, may lead to changes in the type of action pursued.

On a societal level, as the number of violent extremist groups rises, the survival likelihood of all groups declines. Interpreting this collaboration as a reduction in distinct groups – while not a merger, the formal pooling of resources among groups with near-identical goals and approaches to change is significant – the Active Club movement may become more resilient.

Finally, where there is more violent extremist inter-group competition, there is more violence. This finding is harder to relate because this collaboration exists on several levels. On the national level, an increased threat to other far-right groups’ dominant status may lead to more violence. Conversely, the reduction of competition at the local level may limit violence.

Ultimately, the changes in organisational dynamics of Active Clubs – in resource constraints, strategic goals, group size, group longevity and group competition – may lead to changes in activity, such as the frequency of action, levels of violence, weapon selection and recruitment.

Hold on a minute: something's different

Despite the insights of the work above, however, there are several limitations to how useful this scholarship can be for the current scenario. Two categories immediately surface. First, we need more information on the organisational level. The above studies focused on:

  • ‘simple’ growth (an increase in resources)
  • formal organisations (those with formal hierarchies)
  • actively violent extremist organisations

However, current Active Club growth does not fit neatly into these categories. Active Clubs are growing horizontally (i.e. pooling resources) as well as vertically (in membership / spread). They are building bottom-up cell-style rather than through top-down leadership. Finally, though Active Clubs are emerging from a violent past, they are not yet openly engaging in violence. While prior research offers suggestions on what might follow organisational change, we cannot be sure.

Active Clubs are pooling resources as well as growing membership. These 'mergers' could either threaten other groups' dominant status – or they could drive further far-right collaboration

Second, we lack information on how these formalised collaborations will affect perceptions from other extremist groups and the broader public. While this may threaten other far-right groups’ dominant status, it could instead drive further collaboration across the far right. Furthermore, we do not know how this development will affect public perceptions of the groups, nor how this will impact on recruitment.

If the Pacific Northwest is anything to go by, Active Club growth may shed light on such people's extreme views, and may alienate rather than attract more moderate nationalists. Until more research looks at this, however, only time can tell.

A call for action

While prior research suggests several potential dimensions of change, much more is needed to fully understand how the creation of the Northwest Nationalist Network will impact on Active Club activity. Currently, interventionists are left stranded on how best to proceed. If we hope to limit either recruitment or action, we need to better understand what to look for, when and where these changes will happen, and who is most likely to be affected. Heading off this new threat demands immediate and significant collaboration between practitioners and academics.

This article presents the views of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the ECPR or the Editors of The Loop.


photograph of Jack Wippell
Jack Wippell
PhD Student, Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University

Jack's research interests include far-right extremism; radicalisation and terrorism; de-radicalisation and re-entry.

He consults with non-profits and practitioners on these topics.

He is currently completing a project focused on preventing recruitment to extremism in the Pacific Northwest.


He tweets @JGRWippell

Read more articles by this author

Share Article

Republish Article

We believe in the free flow of information Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Creative Commons License


2 comments on “‘Active Clubs’: a new collaborative phenomenon on the far-right scene”

  1. Mate, they are just white men getting together to become physically healthy, and share discussions of their ideology. To conflate them with street gangs is disingenuous. They don't lie, rob people, attack people, etc.

    What is extreme about providing community to your own people, when journalists like you demonize them?

    1. Left wing fascism is really a sad and scary thing to see. I'm from the traditional civil libertarian mold of I disagree with what you say, but will defend your right to say it. Now there is an extreme fascist section of the left that believes I don't agree with what you say so you need to be in prison.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Loop

Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
Read more
Advancing Political Science
© 2024 European Consortium for Political Research. The ECPR is a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO) number 1167403 ECPR, Harbour House, 6-8 Hythe Quay, Colchester, CO2 8JF, United Kingdom.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram