As Donald Trump's executive order on gender identity sends shockwaves through North America, Conservative Party of Canada Leader Pierre Poilievre's calculated silence during a recent TV interview reveals how American cultural battles are crossing borders. Elie Kallab examines how this strategic pivot threatens to fundamentally alter Canada's democratic landscape
We are at a pivotal and consequential time in Canada's history. In a late January TV interview on Toronto Channel CP24, Conservative Party of Canada Leader Pierre Poilievre revealed how American cultural battles are reshaping democracy beyond US borders. Questioned by the interviewer about Trump's sweeping executive order on gender identity, Poilievre chose calculated silence: 'Let's talk about what matters to Canadians — the cost of living'.
That deft deflection, portraying human rights as a luxury Canada cannot afford during economic uncertainty, signals a profound shift in North American politics.
Just days earlier, on 20 January, Trump's executive order Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government had resounded like a thunderclap across the continent. But it isn't the order's content that should worry defenders of democracy — it's how conservative movements beyond America's borders are quietly adopting its language and logic.
When the executive order speaks of 'biological truth' and frames gender identity as a threat to 'women's dignity, safety, and well-being', it does more than set policy — it reinforces a worldview where deviation from traditional roles becomes a threat to society itself. Research reveals a deeper pattern: when heterosexual men feel their traditional privileges challenged by equality, they increasingly embrace biological determinism to defend the status quo.
America will reclaim its rightful place by restoring biological truth in federal law
Trump Executive Order, 2025
This isn't just rhetoric — it's a blueprint being tested across North America. From Florida to Texas, similar restrictions on gender-affirming healthcare have become Republican rallying cries. Each court challenge and protest underscores a deepening divide that now threatens to reshape Canadian politics.
The numbers tell a compelling story: Poilievre, whose Conservative Party now leads national polls at 42.54% against the Liberal Party's 25.5%, presents Canadians with a manufactured choice: economic stability or human rights. Such a framing suggests Canada must choose between addressing inflation and protecting fundamental freedoms enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This calculated move suggests Canadians must choose between fighting inflation and protecting Charter freedoms. The evidence proves otherwise.
We will reclaim our citizenship, our values, our lives from toxic woke ideology
PIERRE POILIEVRE, HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA, 2023
Yet, Canada’s economic growth and inclusion policies have, historically, gone hand in hand. The evidence is clear: nations that invest in inclusive social policies tend to foster greater economic innovation and stability.
Sweden and Germany show how economic vitality and human rights strengthen each other. Their success exposes the false narrative that we must sacrifice dignity for prosperity.
The Canadian Charter isn't just law — it's the bedrock of our democracy. When a movement, a party, or an individual frames human rights as luxuries during tough times, they're not just challenging policies. They're undermining the very foundation of Canadian values.
There's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation
PIERRE TRUDEAU, 1968
This sentiment, echoed throughout Canada's progressive legal history, underscores how deeply these rights are embedded in the nation's framework. Rolling them back — whether overtly or subtly — would set a dangerous precedent.
Current Canadian policies reflect years of progress toward inclusion: gender-neutral 'X' markers on passports, federal workplace protections, educational inclusion guidelines, and healthcare access policies. When Poilievre dismisses these as 'identity politics' to focus solely on economics, he creates an artificial divide.
The parent seeking respect for their child's identity at school, the worker wanting safe workplace conditions, and the citizen requiring accurate identification documents — these aren't distractions from 'real' issues. They are real issues, affecting real Canadians' daily lives.
Moreover, studies show that inclusive workplace policies increase employee retention and overall productivity. Similarly, policies protecting gender identity contribute to better mental health outcomes and overall societal well-being, as well as increasing productivity (a significant issue in Canada).
Canada stands at a crossroads. While American conservatives frame gender identity as a threat to national stability, Canadian conservatives are increasingly echoing their rhetoric. History's most significant moral failures often began not with outright oppression, but with silence.
This isn't about conservative versus liberal. Nor is it about tradition versus progress. It's about whether Canada will continue its proud history of moral leadership or whether it will attempt to reshape Canadian values using imported political narratives that treat human dignity as negotiable.
The coming election will test how deeply these values are ingrained in Canada's political conscience. Will Canadians reject this false choice between economic stability and human rights? Or will they allow imported culture wars to define their democracy?
If Canadian history is any indication, voters have upheld human rights even in the face of economic downturns. The question remains: will this commitment hold firm, or will new political currents succeed in reshaping the country's values?
Choose wisely, Canada. Future generations will ask what we did when it mattered most.
No.22 in a Loop thread on Gendering Democracy. Look out for the 🌈 to read more in this series
