2024 elections: a stress test for democracy

Elections are the primary channel for political leaders to gain power in democracies. Amid concerns about the state of democracy around the world, Angelo Vito Panaro contends that in the 2024 elections, democratic regimes performed relatively well in comparison with autocracies

What constitutes democracy?

Democracy requires, at bare minimum, regular free, fair, and competitive elections. At its maximum, democracy involves procedural elements, such as the rule of law, political participation, and accountability, along with substantive elements, such as political rights and civil liberties. Assessing countries around the world on some key constitutive elements — political participation, alternation in government, and equal access to power — democracies performed relatively well in last year's elections.

2024 elections overview

2024 was the ‘super election year’. Voters headed to the polls in 92 countries, of which 21 held regional and local elections, and 71 presidential or parliamentary elections. Electoral data is available for 62 of these countries, of which 33 held presidential elections, and 52 parliamentary elections. Presidential and parliamentary elections took place in 23 countries.

Greyed-out countries held elections during 2024

Source: Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) v.15 (2025)

Elections were held in 32 democracies and 30 electoral autocracies. The latter are regimes in which elections are neither free nor fair, and political competition is constrained. Examples include Russia, Iran, and Venezuela.

Voter turnout

Voter turnout varied. Parliamentary elections have an average 64.7% turnout — higher than the 63.3% for presidential elections. Highest turnout for presidential elections was Rwanda, at 98.2%. Lowest was Tunisia, at 11.4%.

Turnout in presidential elections, 2024

Source: Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) v.15 (2025)

Parliamentary election turnout also varied. The highest recorded was Rwanda, at 98.2%. The lowest was Jordan, at 31.3%. Voter participation was higher in democracies, at 66.9% on average, compared with autocracies, at 61.4%.

Turnout in parliamentary elections, 2024

Source: Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) v.15 (2025)

Government turnover

In the 48 countries that held lower chamber or unicameral legislative elections (excluding Chad, from which no data is available), no turnover occurred in 26 countries. In these cases, the majority party or ruling coalition remained the same or largely unchanged. Only five countries experienced partial turnover. In these cases, minority parties, previously in opposition, assumed the leading position in the legislature, though remained dependent on other parties' support. In 17 countries, including Austria, Belgium, Indonesia, Portugal, and the United Kingdom, a new party or coalition gained the majority.

Interestingly, in 33 countries, the same executive remained in power. In eight countries, the head of state or government changed, yet still hailed from the same party or executive coalition that governed prior to the elections. Only in 18 countries, including Belgium, Portugal, Senegal, the United Kingdom, and the United States, did the newly elected president or head of government come from a different party or coalition to the incumbent.

Source: Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) v.15 (2025)

Executive turnover was more common in democracies. A new party or coalition gained power in 14 democracies, while only four autocracies – Indonesia, Iran, Pakistan, and Somaliland – elected a new governing party or coalition. Executives were more likely in autocracies than democracies to retain power after the elections. Of the 33 countries where the same executive remained in power, 21 are classified as autocracies, and 12 democracies.

Women in power

Only 23% of parliamentary seats across all countries were occupied by women. Proportions range from 63.8% in Rwanda to just 4.3% in Bhutan. Democracies allocated 28% of seats to women, compared with 18% in autocracies.

Percentage of parliamentary seats occupied by women, by country, following 2024 elections

Source: Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) v.15 (2025)

Stress test passed, but too early to declare victory for democracy

Reassuringly, the 2024 elections confirmed that voter turnout does indeed remain higher in democracies. A greater number of women were elected, and executive turnover was more frequent than in autocracies. Democracies continue to foster greater electoral participation and promote alternation of power. They also offer more opportunities than autocracies for women to attain political power.

Despite these findings, it is premature to draw optimistic conclusions about the state of democracy based on 2024 elections alone. Access to power for women remains alarmingly low, even in democracies. In Argentina, Austria, and the United States, anti-pluralist parties gained power, raising concerns about the future state of democracy in these countries. And even in countries like Poland and Portugal, where anti-pluralist parties failed to access government, electoral support for such parties increased. This trend, alongside the rise of far-right parties at the last EU elections, suggests that democracy may still have serious challenges to overcome.

This article presents the views of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the ECPR or the Editors of The Loop.

Author

photograph of Angelo Vito Panaro
Angelo Vito Panaro
Postdoctoral Researcher, Institute of Political Science, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

Angelo is a member of the Academic Freedom Index project.

His research interests include authoritarianism, democratic backsliding, comparative welfare states, social policy, global redistribution, and socio-economic inequality.

He has published in journals including Democratization, Contemporary Politics, Review of Policy Research, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, Italian Political Science Review, and Italian Political Science.

Angelo holds a PhD in political science from Scuola Normale Superiore.

@angelovpanaro.bsky.social

LinkedIn

Read more articles by this author

Share Article

Republish Article

We believe in the free flow of information Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Creative Commons License

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Loop

Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
Read more
THE EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH
Advancing Political Science
© 2024 European Consortium for Political Research. The ECPR is a charitable incorporated organisation (CIO) number 1167403 ECPR, Harbour House, 6-8 Hythe Quay, Colchester, CO2 8JF, United Kingdom.
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram