Articles by Daniel Naurin

October 1, 2020

The dilemma of dissent: should courts avoid making public their dissenting opinions?

Daniel Naurin

It is widely argued that courts should make public their dissenting opinions in order to right wrongs and increase transparency. Yet, writes Daniel Naurin, courts will have a harder time securing public compliance with their decisions if they fail to speak with one voice

Daniel Naurin

Director, ARENA Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo

Daniel's research interests include European Union politics, judicial politics, interest groups, and transparency

The Loop

Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.