Deterrence is back — but not as we knew it. Once a strategy of nuclear restraint, the term is now being stretched to justify aggressive military actions, at home and abroad. Konstantin Schendzielorz argues that, as meanings shift, so do red lines. The nuclear umbrella may be turning into a very real sword
PhD Candidate, Institute of Political Science, University of St Gallen
Konstantin's dissertation investigates the discourses in Germany and the United States regarding the US nuclear umbrella from the 1950s until the present.
His research interests focus on (extended) nuclear deterrence, deterrence theory, and the role of discourses in nuclear weapon policy.
The Loop
Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. These will be set only if you accept.
▼
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
▼
Analytics Cookies
Google Analytics
We'd like to set Google Analytics cookies to help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on how you use it. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone. For more information on how these cookies work please see our Privacy Notice.
