In just one month, a bill equating abortion with homicide reached the voting stage in Brazil’s Lower House. How did this happen? Daniel Baldin Machado examines how a decade of institutional changes has reshaped legislative processes to sideline scrutiny, deepen gendered biases, and weaken democratic accountabilit
Daniel’s main research interest lies in the dynamics of agenda-setting: why some issues are seriously considered by the government, whereas others are disregarded, not discussed, and not voted on.
More specifically, his research focuses on public policies relating to gender, seeking to reveal the dynamics behind the inclusion and exclusion of gender-related bills in the Brazilian Congress’ agenda.
His doctoral thesis, 'Agenda Gatekeepers: Policy Processes, Gendered Institutions and Status-Quo Maintenance', explores the dynamics of resistance against gender-related bills within the Brazilian legislature, and is supervised by Rosalind Shorrocks, Georgina Waylen, and Lotte Hargrave.
Daniel also conducted fieldwork in the Brazilian capital, in cooperation with the University of Brasília and under the supervision of Michelle Fernandez.
The Loop
Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. These will be set only if you accept.
▼
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
▼
Analytics Cookies
Google Analytics
We'd like to set Google Analytics cookies to help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on how you use it. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone. For more information on how these cookies work please see our Privacy Notice.