In just one month, a bill equating abortion with homicide reached the voting stage in Brazil’s Lower House. How did this happen? Daniel Baldin Machado examines how a decade of institutional changes has reshaped legislative processes to sideline scrutiny, deepen gendered biases, and weaken democratic accountabilit
Daniel’s main research interest lies in the dynamics of agenda-setting: why some issues are seriously considered by the government, whereas others are disregarded, not discussed, and not voted on.
More specifically, his research focuses on public policies relating to gender, seeking to reveal the dynamics behind the inclusion and exclusion of gender-related bills in the Brazilian Congress’ agenda.
His doctoral thesis, 'Agenda Gatekeepers: Policy Processes, Gendered Institutions and Status-Quo Maintenance', explores the dynamics of resistance against gender-related bills within the Brazilian legislature, and is supervised by Rosalind Shorrocks, Georgina Waylen, and Lotte Hargrave.
Daniel also conducted fieldwork in the Brazilian capital, in cooperation with the University of Brasília and under the supervision of Michelle Fernandez.
The Loop
Cutting-edge analysis showcasing the work of the political science discipline at its best.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.