Thank you for pointing to a necessary clarification. In your work, you discuss electoral rights in relation to citizenship, noting indeed the world trend of countries granting electoral rights to their citizens living abroad. In the work I cite here, you propose stakeholder citizenship as an alternate way of dealing with the question who should be allowed to vote in a polity. It has been my interpretation of your work that the reasons why you would argue that second+ generation non-resident citizens should not be allowed to vote in the polity of origin are similar to those why non-citizen residents should be, and this is linked to being a stakeholder. I understand that the latter term relates. for you, to a lot more than just residency, and I can understand how the wording of my citation of your work could be interpreted as misrepresentation of your argument. This has now been corrected. In any case, your work has been an inspiration and I thank you for taking interest in mine.